some heads who can string together a sentence might be useful

[Lanod]

Originally Posted by Sparks

Once again, you're questioning my motivation and saying that it was to question someone else's motivation and that pissed you off and you don't see the irony in this?

Do you understand the meaning of the word motivation?

[Sparks]

Yes, but apparently you need the definition of the word, and the definition of irony. You're claiming that you know why I asked what I asked and that it was to question why he did what he did, and that my questioning his motivation was annoying; but you have no problem with you questioning my motivation?
Feck off Lanod.

[Lanod]

Originally Posted by Sparks

Yes, but apparently you need the definition of the word, and the definition of irony. You're claiming that you know why I asked what I asked and that it was to question why he did what he did, and that my questioning his motivation was annoying; but you have no problem with you questioning my motivation?
Feck off Lanod.

Yes - I can question your motivation because you can respond. Or I can read between the lines of your post becuse I have been reading your posts for years.

You are questioning his evidence - not his motivation. You are implying he must have lied because you heard you can't get it up on E - deny that if you will.

[Sparks]

Or I can read between the lines of your post becuse I have been reading your posts for years.

Oh, hooray, you can read my mind without needing to crack open my skull and munch on the gooey grayness within. I'm quite impressed. In fact, why bother to ask me what I think at all? Why not just make up what I'm saying, in fact, why do you need to be here at all? What possible new information could you glean from these posts that you don't already know?

Fecks sake...

[Lanod]

Ok - why were you interested in the fact that you thought it was impossible to get it up on E?

[Sparks]

Because it was the direct opposite of what I'd previously heard.

[J]

Originally Posted by Lanod

Ok - why were you interested in the fact that you thought it was impossible to get it up on E?

Asking this in the first place instead of assuming stuff might have been a better move.

[Lanod]

Originally Posted by J

Asking this in the first place instead of assuming stuff might have been a better move.

Yes, kicking myself.

[Lanod]

Originally Posted by Sparks

Because it was the direct opposite of what I'd previously heard.

I get that bit. Why was it relevant?

And if I accused you in the wrong - I apologize.

[Clarabel]

there is a message from said blog:
UPDATE: Readers coming in from the Lounge at techfocus.net, leave comments, will you? I can't call you up on dropping me in it in what seems to be an interforum spat between two members, but telling each other I'm wrong when I know I'm not is beginning to get my rabid goat, that it is. Oh, but don't just believe me. I'm only going on personal experience and the research of Nicholas Saunders, me.

[veritas]

Who put sand in her gee?

[J]

Ah leave her Shes ANGRY you know....

[veritas]

Originally Posted by J

Ah leave her Shes ANGRY you know....

I didn't get that from her blog, the classic signs were amiss.

[J]

I need me a blog.

[Lanod]

Originally Posted by Clarabel

there is a message from said blog:
UPDATE: Readers coming in from the Lounge at techfocus.net, leave comments, will you? I can't call you up on dropping me in it in what seems to be an interforum spat between two members, but telling each other I'm wrong when I know I'm not is beginning to get my rabid goat, that it is. Oh, but don't just believe me. I'm only going on personal experience and the research of Nicholas Saunders, me.

What a mong! And she has a goat!